Scotland’s Programme for Government 2018-19 has outlined their intention to implement the recommendations of the Homelessness and Rough Sleeping Action Group (HARSAG).
From the beginning, HARSAG highlighted the need to improve our knowledge of rough sleeping across Scotland if we are to achieve the ambitious goal of ending rough sleeping in Scotland. To be able to test, refine, evaluate and improve our efforts to reduce rough sleeping over time, we need to be able to measure its key elements. Evidence is at the heart of any successful change initiative, as findings can be used to underpin strategy and ensure accountability. Better data would enable us to gather the information needed to first understand the scope of the challenge and then assess ongoing progress.
This is why HARSAG recommended the use our SHARE framework in the development of a new rough sleeping data and monitoring system for Scotland. Following this, we were asked by the Scottish Government to carry out an options appraisal for the proposed new national data and monitoring system.
The hope is that a more complete picture of the landscape would ensure the sector is working towards ending rough sleeping more effectively – enabling both for more joined up working on the ground and more informed decision-making from the top. In this area, better data ultimately means better results for people experiencing homelessness, better use of resources and better evaluation of the effectiveness of efforts to end rough sleeping.
The Centre for Homelessness Impact and the Scottish Government have been been researching and co-designing the options appraisal with people across the sector – from strategic to front-line, and with those with lived experiences of rough sleeping in Scotland. Their knowledge and lived expertise holds the keys to the success of the system itself.
The options appraisal also has an expert advisory panel which will meet over the duration of the options appraisal to guide the process. Listen to it's members give their thoughts towards the first workshop and the potential for the project as they see it:
It's members include:
Beth Sandor - Community Solutions
Catriona MacKean - Scottish Government
Dr Emily Tweed - University of Glasgow
Grant Campbell - Glasgow City Mission
John Mills - Fife Council
Julie Hunter - North Lanarkshire Council
Dr Lars Benjaminsen - The Danish National Centre for Social Research
Lorraine McGrath - Simon Community Scotland
Margaret-Ann Brunjes - Glasgow Homelessness Network
Ruth Whatling - Scottish Government
Dr Peter Mackie - Cardiff University
Susanne Millar - Glasgow City Council
Professor Suzanne Fitzpatrick - Heriot-Watt University
Yvette Burgess - Housing Support Enabling Unit
It’s fantastic to see Scotland’s Programme for Government’s commitment to improving the lives of those experiencing the worst forms of homelessness. The Centre believes that work like this is vital to building the infrastructure required to end homelessness more effectively.
More updates will be coming soon and the findings of our options appraisal will be shared later this year. In the meantime, get in touch if you'd like to know more at firstname.lastname@example.org
The impact of providing people housing outside their local area: An Evaluation of HomeFinder UK
Find out more about our plans for evaluating HomeFinder UK and how it will enable us to better understand how approaches to out of area moves impact people.
What can universities do to prevent homelessness?
What has homelessness got to do with universities? The responses to this question may range from a puzzled shrug to an emphatic ‘nothing’. Is not ending homelessness the responsibility of the state, some will ask? The prevalence of homelessness tends to be higher in university towns and cities, in some cases strikingly so.
Could universities do more to prevent homelessness?
Universities should do more to track and prevent homelessness among their students and can play a significant, wider role in supporting efforts to end all forms of homelessness, our latest policy paper published in partnership with the Higher Education Policy Institute argues.